hahah.. what Alison said for this...ahem!
The meaning to me is where the gold is. But yes, the message can get lost if the message is not delivered with clarity and adherence to language rules.
I am a sucker for it, if one does not know the rules, is it easier for them to broken?
I think of the book I read recently with questionable punctuation. Was a purposeful choice. I loved it.
It took me a couple of chapters to get used to it, but as long as I wasn't distracted with it not following the norm, I still understood the story.
Winner of the Booker Prize - 2019 - Girl, Woman, Other - Bernardine Evaristo.
More food for thought -
"I cnduo't bvleiee taht I culod aulaclty uesdtannrd waht I was rdnaieg. Unisg the icndeblire pweor of the hmuan mnid, aocdcrnig to rseecrah at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mttaer in waht oderr the lterets in a wrod are, the olny irpoamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rhgit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whoutit a pboerlm. Tihs is bucseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey ltteer by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Aaznmig, huh? Yaeh and I awlyas tghhuot slelinpg was ipmorantt! See if yuor fdreins can raed tihs too."
I still understood. As long as I didn't focus my energy on the "perfection".
mmm ... yes a a thought I am still attempting to refine in delieverance. Mostly it has been met with "You are being ridiculous!" remarks.
I really do understand what you mean here though. It is part of me questioning the "should" and "should not" of my little world.
Thanks for writing.
Thanks for shining a way to be "heard".
Most importantantly, thank you for being you.